You don't find that often in today's comics. But in the late sixties and early seventies, it was kind of a thing. The format was that you would take one headliner, a hero that could hold his own book, and match him up with one second stringer. A hero that the publisher felt couldn't sustain his own series.
The two most notable examples are Captain America and the Falcon, and Green Lantern and Green Arrow. These two titles were among my favorites as a kid.
That simple premise has two alterations. The first is two enormously popular heroes jammed together. Superman and Batman headlined World's Finest for years. And the disparities of their partnership was what made the team up interesting.
There's a guy at work that insists that "Batman is not a super hero". He's not a comic book reader, and is basing his argument on the fact that Batman has no powers. It's a good premise, but really.... this is a character routinely lumped in with other 'super heroes' in the Justice League.
In the 1940's, the distinction was more clear cut. Superman was seen as a 'super hero' that would respond to any situation that couldn't be handled by normal man. Batman was more of a masked crime fighter. This explanation seemed to please my co-worker.
The other alteration to the team-up premise is to match up two heroes whose solo books aren't doing all that great. Maybe the readers of both heroes would each buy the new title and double sales. The approach has had limited success. Hawkman and the Atom were squeezed together in the late sixties, and their book was cancelled soon after.
The pairing of Power Man and Iron Fist gave both characters a needed boost and they successfully held their book for years, until finally falling under the ax. But the team-up is well remembered by fans and they keep popping up paired together in the Marvel universe because of these fond memories.
There are many things about comics that I wish they would bring back. Team-up books are high on the list. But that wish still falls far behind 'good stories' and 'younger readers'.
Thanks,
DCD
Yeah…I wish there was more for younger readers too. Though, perhaps there are more subscriptions aimed at Andrew's age that I don't know about. He LOVES the one he gets now. When he sees it in our pile of mail he always screams "Mommy! Mommy!!! LOOK!!!!" and reads it that day.
ReplyDeleteI think another problem is image. As a parent, I wouldn't think of comics as a good reading option if you were not my brother. I wouldn't know where to find them…or…I guess…I wouldn't bother looking, assuming comics were too violent and too sexy. So…there *may* be other titles appropriate for my kidlets…but I feel like the industry could do more to grow awareness among parents that those titles are out there.
So….fix that, would ya?
Even my kids see the value in the partnership. Whenever we're watch Superman or Batman the animated series they get "super " excited when another super hero makes an appearance.
ReplyDeleteMatt
The currently on-going Ultimate Spider-Man cartoon is a good example of this. Obviously you've got Spider-Man as the headliner but it's really about him working with a team that includes Nova, White Tiger, Power Man, and Iron Fist. Those other characters are probably not going to support a show on their own. They also have tons of cameos from the likes of Iron Man, Captain America, Thor, Hulk, and others.
ReplyDelete